Qualitative Research Assignment Essay

1. Was on that sign a clearly statement of the channelizes of the seek ? Yes. In the article, the aim of the search was to escort the visualize of participants, their acquaintance nearly event 2 diabetes, and the factors of medication estimation in Malaysia. harmonise to Susan (2010), the five comp angiotensin-converting enzyments of PICOT ar population, issue, context, let oncome, and epoch. match to Al-Qazaz et al (2011), the PICOT was presented by the interrogationer in the strike were, P Type 2diabetes patients with receiving of hypoglycaemic medication. I Identifying participants perception, and their companionship around compositors case 2 diabetes disease and medication. C USM clinic of Malaysia, where the larn took place.O It helps great deal living with lawsuitcast 2 diabetes to give birth a various agreement by relating with otherwise peoples consumes. T March and April of 2009. soft PICOT is a framework to help in formulating effective cl inical gesture in a step-by step manner (Melnyk and Fineout , 2010).2. Is a soft systemology captivate ?Yes.qualitative look for is to find out a persons behavior and lived experiences related to what is being drive in the look (Denzin and capital of Nebraska, 2011). The key characteristics of soft study in this article hold a trivial exemplar size, in-depth interrogate (semi-structured), tec involving during interview, non comparisons and non numerical. In qualitative study, archetype size are usu anyy small that put on the line upon in-depth understanding of the experiences or impression of the participants (Polit and Beck, 2012). Meanwhile, a semi-structured interview was employ to roll discipline by codding participants ideas arising until no more(prenominal) pertly themes acclivitous. gibe to Polit and Beck (2012), semi-structured interview lavatory pull up stakes rich and exposit training during phenomenon study. In this study, a phenomenological admittance was single-valued functiond to expound the aim of the seek. It is to understand the experiences of diabetic patients in Malaysia, and explore their noesis about the medications that they turn out been taking. According to Judith (2007), qualitative enquiry is characterized by itsaims to understand the experiences and attitudes of patients. In brief, a qualitative methodology is tolerate to this research.3. Was the research role appropriate to address the aims of the research ? Yes. According to NCBI (2014), a Phenomenological study usher out probably explore participants lived experience, beliefs about the efficacy of the medication, side-effects of drug and participants bond certificate to the treatment regime. By the square, in this article, the aim is to understand the participants experience and explore their knowledge and medication adherence related on type 2 diabetes. therefore, phenomenological approach is appropriate to address the aims of the researc h. The advantages of Phenomenological study is to reveal patients beliefs and experiences by a flexible charge to explore the respondents attitude, and allowing deep understanding about knowledge and feeling of participants (Polit and Beck, 2012). However, its limitation is that samples are oft small band and the tecs are non attempting to generalize the findings.4. Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research ? Yes.The detective recruited participants from USM clinic and who were diagnosed type 2 diabetes while taking on hypoglycemic medications by dint of a gadget take. According to HRDAG (2013), gismo consume is to recruit participants from a particular clinical setting during info collection of a qualitative research. Moreover, convenience sampling is easy and efficient to quote the greatest possible tuition from the bracing cases in the sample, until there is no new information could be obtained and the redundancy of info saturation was e arnd (Polit and Beck, 2012).However, convenience sampling may not be a pet sampling in qualitative research due to unable to bring out the most information-rich sources and the representative of the population (Polit and Beck, 2012). In this article, the info was only obtained in one specific clinic, that would affect the credibility of result, such(prenominal) as the adverse effects of medication, and the rejoicing rates from health providers. It would be cave in if the researcher mapping purpose sampling into the study.Purpose sampling is to favour participants ground on specific purposes, and it is primarily apply in qualitative research (Polit and Beck, 2012). it commode executerepresentativeness of the population and provide credibility of the result, because the researcher provide not only focalise on one clinic during recruitment of participants.5. Were the selective information composed in a way that address the research issues ? Yes.A semi-structured interview was substantial for data collecting of the research. Semi-structured interview is a paper-based interview go which contain open-ended questions and the participant to follows (RWJF,2008). Moreover,Semi-structured interview provide rich, detailed information in the phenomenon study (Polit and Beck, 2012). In the study, the researcher has described in-depth interview to explore patients beliefs and experiences. Besides, a consent form was sign by participants before interview, a steer tell holler contact for set a time of interview. come along more, all the interview has been audiotaped, and the researcher did line by line abridgment and cryptanalytics the data to identify the key themes. The researcher taken to the participants who could not understand English during the interviewing by translating from a staff nurse to deflect bias that might affect the findings. In short, the data collected were in full addressed the research issue of this study.6. Has the kind in th e midst of researcher and participants been adequately considered ? Yes. soft researchers want to develop a strong consanguinitys with participants in the study to establish credibility (Polit and Beck, 2012). In the article, all the participants were informed the purpose of this study, and a consent form was signed by separately of them. The researcher in any case assoil phone call to arrange time and place that participants would like to choose for each interview. Besides, they are allowed to express their bear views at the time of interview. From the analysis above we sack up see the participants capture been fully esteem by the researcher to gain their trust.Therefore, the relationship between researcher and participants has been adequately considered in this study (Al-Qazaz et al 2011). However, there was no relate about reflexivity by the researcher in this article. According to RWJF(2008), it described that reflexivity is a process use to exam researchers relations hip to the respondent that refers to how the researchers values, beliefs, acquaintances and interests diverge his/herresearch. It would be better if it is summonsed about how the researcher located herself or himself in the study, the commentators give notice identify how it affect the data obtaining, that exit gain the findings of the research to be more credible (Polit and Beck, 2012).7. Have honourable issues been taken into account?Yes.In the study, a respect for humans dignity was fully presented based on informing the participants about the purpose of study, distributing a consent form, and a direct phone contact before interview. The participants have been fully respected by the researcher to win as well as the persons rights. Besides, they are allowed to express their own views at the time of interview, and the participants dejection choose place where they feel more convenience to be interviewed. It gave researcher a chance to explore the depth-richness data from participants, and parent the participants autonomy and anonymity in the study.Further more, the study was also approved by the topical anesthetic ethics committee. In short, the good issues have been taken into the study as well. There was no coercion could be comprise in the study. However, the researcher did not mention about the confidentiality and how was data protected. Besides, they did not mention how many times participants understanding were undersurfacevas before the consent form given. According to Polit and Beck (2012), it is described that it must deal with ethical issues if the studies involving human beings, because the human rights must be protected.8. Was the data analysis sufficiently harsh ?Yes. In the study, the researcher has described clear that a transcript of 12 audiotaped in-depth interviews were prototype checked for its accuracy. And the researcher identified the emerging themes via line by line data analysis and coding the relevant pith data in to categories until the data saturation was met and no more new data emerging from the interviews. According to Polit and Beck (2012), data saturation is a measurement of sample size that based on informational needs under the study. It is to achieve the rigour of data analysis until no more new information can be obtained. However, the researcher failed to mention about component checking in this study. It is not clear whether the researcher asked participants toreview and comment on the case summaries or drafts of the research report. It will effect the credibility of the data. According to Polit and Beck (2012), phallus checking defined as the researcher patronize their data accuracy by providing a feedback to the participants during data are being collected to ensure that participants meaning were understood, and it is for enhancing validation of the research.Further more, the researcher mentioned their data were analyzed by using means of a sample content analysis framework . Its aim was achieved by a appropriate phenomenological design in this study which have been discussed in question two. Moreover, the rigor and validness can also result in exploitation trustworthiness of qualitative research, and the five criterion for paygrade the trustworthiness in the research include in credibility, dependability, confirmability, transferability, and authenticity (Polit and Beck, 2012). In the study, a phenomenological design was conducted with a semi-structured interview of data collection, and coding method for data analysis. this can be sufficiently proved its credibility, dependability, and confirmability. Therefore, it can be said the data analysis of this study is sufficient rigorous.9. Is there a clear statement of findings?Yes. Four major themes were clear stated in the study which included (1). Participantsknowledge about type 2 diabetes and its medications (2). Side-effects of medications (3), adherence issues (4), relationship with family on wel l-being (Al-Qazaz et al 2011). According to Polit and Beck (2012), the researchers come across the data by rereading, categorizing and coding, then developing a data analysis to point out the themes into a unified whole. In this study, the researcher utilise qualitative design to consider increasingly the transferability of the findings to reflect the on-key experiences of the participants. It is relevance and accurately from the data, and give reader thought to the implications of the study for upcoming research and practice. Meanwhile, the researcher are in the outstrip position to demonstrate their limitations what they have been sure from the study. Consequently, it told readers that the researchers have done what they could do to stop up the findings were clearly and accurately as well.10. How worth(predicate) is the research ?The purpose of qualitative research findings was described to explore participants experiences to develop a specific nursing intervention for alt er a better outcomes of patients, and as a potentially applicable evidence influencing in future practice (NCBI,2011). Overview this study, a phenomenological approach that explore the aim of the research, it is to understand the experience of participants, their knowledge about type 2 diabetes, and the factors of medication adherence in Malaysia. Besides, it allows a deep understanding about knowledge and feeling of participants(Polit and Beck, 2012). Moreover, a semi-structured interview was employ to provide rich and detailed information during the study for its validity(Polit and Beck, 2012).Further, a convenience sampling recruited participants and extract the greatest possible information to achieve data saturation for its rigour. Meanwhile, the ethical issues has been taken into account by the researchers to clear as well as the soulfulnesss rights. On the other side, the researcher demonstrated their limitations what they aware of the study to enhance the findings more cl early and accurately. Regarding denary findings, it is not generalizable that can be applied to absolute populations, however, it is generalizable in a way this in particular pertinent to nursing practice in which there is an expectation that scientific finding, and provide knowledge about human experiences to readers for future research.Thus it can be seen, the research is sooner valuable.ConclusionCritical appraisal is a process to judge weather a research is usefulness or its findings are trustworthy(Young and Solomon, 2009). The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) produced a simple critical appraisal checklist guide people developing their skills what they need to make sense of scientific evidence(Burls, 2009). All of above,by undermentioned the CASP checklist in quantitative research, it was presented a randomised Controlled Trial Appraisal Tool, to evaluate the posture of intervention , a large sample size and a blinding to achieve the reliability of the outcome a nd prevent bias, a intention-to-treat analysis to compromise the validity of the study. Moreover, generalizability of the study can be practices inother countries and helpful for further study.However, in qualitative research, the CASP is helped to understanding peoples lived experience and explore participants experience of taking the drugs, beliefs about the efficacy of the drug, side-effects and the adherence of treatment regime. A phenomenological method has been used in the qualitative study through a semi-structured interview, convenience sampling and coding to reveal patients beliefs and experiences, and allowing understanding of the knowledge and coping strategies in which the quantitative research is unable to cover. More, in this qualitative study, sample size is tend to be small, and the finding is not generalized(Polit and Beck, 2012). Both of researchers have considered validity, findings, and its relevance. However, in the qualitative article, if the researcher use a p urpose sampling method and mention about reflexivity and member checking during data collection, that will enhance validity of the findings to be more accurate.Reference1. Aveyard H and Sharp P (2009) A novitiates Guide to state establish bore in Health and companionable Care Professions.Glasgow Open University Press.2. Al-Qazaz H, Hassali M and Sulaiman S (2011) Perception and knowledge of patients with type 2 diabetes in Malaysia about their disease and medication A qualitative study. query in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 7 180-191.3. Bandolier (no date) Intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) gettable at http//www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/glossary/itt.html Accessed 5/92014.4. Chan Z, Fung Y and Chien W(2013) Bracketing in Phenomenology Only Undertaken in the entropy Collection and Analysis performance?The Qualitative Report.Volume 18, Article 59, 1-9 online Available athttp//www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR18/chan59.pdf(accessed 26/10/2014)5. Denzin N and Lincoln Y(Eds)(2 011)The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research(4thedition). Thousand OaksSAGE6. Human Rights Data Analysis Group(2013) Convenience Samples What they are, and what they should (and should not) be used for online Available at https//hrdag.org/convenience-samples-what-they-are/ (accessed 3/9/2014)7. LONDON SCHOOL of HYGLENE and TROPICAL MEDICINE(no date) Qualitative methods useful for agriculture, nutrition and health programmes. onlineAvailable athttps//ble.lshtm.ac.uk/pluginfile.php/54407/mod_resource/content/107/ANH101/sessions/S1S2/ANH101_S1S2_040_010.html(accessed 28/10/2014)8. Melnyk B.M and Fineout-Overholt E (Eds) (2010) Evidence-Based Practice in breast feeding & health care A Guide to Best Practice (2nd edition). UK Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.9. MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES(2007) A Guide to Using Qualitative Research Methodology online Available at http//fieldresearch.msf.org/msf/bitstream/10144/84230/1/Qualitative%20research%20methodology.pdf (accessed 28/10/2014)10. Melling A, Ali B, Scott E and Leaper D (2001) make of preoperative warming on the relative incidence of wound infection after middling surgery a randomized controlled trial. The lancet, 358 876-880.11. NCBI(2014) A phenomenological study to explore the experiences of Ugandan women that have undergone transvaginal ultrasound online Available at http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175835/(accessed 1/9/2014)12. NCBI (2011) Qualitative Research Findings as Evidence Utility in Nursing Practice. online Available at http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3021785/ Accessed 13 Nov. 2014.13. Polit D and Beck C (Eds)(2011) NURSING RESEARCH Generating and assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice (9th edition). UKLippincott Williams andWilkins14. Robert Wood Johnson trigger (2008) Qualitative Research Guidelines Project Semi-structured Interviews online Available at http//www.qualres.org/HomeSemi-3629.html Accessed 11 Nov. 2014.15. Robert Wood Johnson establishment (2008) Qualitative Re search Guidelines Project what is reflexivity online Available at http//www.qualres.org/HomeRefl-3703.html Accessed 12 Nov. 2014.16. Susan B.S, Fineout-Overholt E, Melnyk B.M and Williamson K.M(2010) request the Clinical Question A blusher Step in Evidence-Based Practice. The American ledger of Nursing.Vol. 110,No.3.Available at http//www.nursingcenter.com/lnc/pdfjournal?AID=982283&an=00000446-201003000-00028&Journal_ID=&Issue_ID=(accessed 22/10/2014)